IR35 detailed comment
'(4) The circumstances referred to in sub-paragraph (1)(c) include the terms on which the services are provided, having regard to the terms of the contracts forming part of the arrangements under which the services are provided.'[1]
Equally, insofar as the inspector has access to something not available to the service contractor, such as the contract between the agency, which recruited him, and the client, which is or may be relevant, then it should clearly be supplied by the agency or the client or by the inspector. An answer simply by reference to the engagement itself, its length, and the terms of such written contract between the agency and the client cannot be acceptable if regarded as sufficient of itself.
A guidance note, ESM 1004, sets out what is apparently the Revenue's position in relation to such written contracts. There is reference to the fact that the Courts
"will not normally refer to evidence other than that of' the written contract (for example, they will not refer [to] what the parties did in practice)".
It concludes,
"Written contracts are therefore extremely important. When dealing with a written contract you should not try to go behind a written term unless you can clearly demonstrate [that] it does not reflect the true agreement between the parties".
It appears to me clear that the Revenue must bear in mind that under IR35 they are not considering an actual contract between the service company and the client, but imagining or constructing a notional contract which does not in fact exist.
In those circumstances, of course the terms of the contract between the agency and the client as a result of which the service contractor will be present at the site are important, as would be the terms of any contract between the service contractor and the agency.
But, particularly given the fact that, at any rate at present, a contract on standard terms may or may not be imposed by an agency, or may be applicable not by reference to a particular assignment, but on an ongoing basis, and may actually bear no relationship to the (non-contractual) interface between the client and the service contractor, such documents can only form a part, albeit obviously an important part, of the picture.
[mail to Egos Ltd] [Return to Index] [previous] [next] [Egos Ltd 'Welcome' page]
If you're another lawyer or an accountant reading these pages, I'd be happy to discuss any points arising with you - particularly if you'd like to debate any points where you disagree with my views - mail me!
This page was last updated on 3rd March 2001.
No liability is accepted for any inaccuracy in the information in these pages - see full disclaimer
© Roger Sinclair & Egos Ltd - roger@egos.co.uk 2001 - All rights reserved - see full copyright details
The information on these pages is provided free and for information only, and is provided 'as is'. Whilst believed to be correct, it is in no way comprehensive. It is provided for your interest only and is not intended to be relied on as formal legal advice. The posting of information on these pages is not intended to create a lawyer-client relationship, and you should not act or rely on this information without seeking professional advice. No liability is accepted therefore for any errors, or for any losses that may be incurred if it is relied on.
You may read these pages on-line, and download them to
read later, for your own personal use.
This copyright notice must appear on every page that you print from here.
You must not redistribute these pages or any part of them in any form or medium
without first obtaining my consent.
You are welcome to set up links to this website from others.