egos¨ - IR35 cases index


IR35 cases

This page is intended to be a resource of cases relating to IR35 and employment status.  It lists the known reported cases in date order, with links to a summary of each case, which in turn may itself link to the full text of the decision.

Case name, year;  court

What the case was
about, and the end
result

Particular issues raised

Notes

JLJ Services Limited v HMRC 2011 FTT full judgment

IR35;  outside, then inside

Changed status over time

Engagements, initially for a few months at a time and for specific projects, drifted over time into annual renewals with no projects specified.

Helpful outline in para 55 of what the Tribunal perceived as the characteristics of a non-employee Ôcontract workerÕ

Autoclenz Lrtd v Belcher 2011 SC – press summaryfull judgment

Whether ÔworkersÕ for purposes of NMW & WTR – yes they were

Written contract did not reflect reality of joint intent;  what was the true agreement between the parties?

Inequality of bargaining power

Marlen Ltd v HMRC 2011 FTT

IR35;  outside

MoO, control, all other factors

 

ECR Consulting v HMRC (2011) FTT

IR35;  outside

In business on own account, hypothetical contract would have been for services

 

MBF Design Services Ltd v HMRC (2011) FTT

IR35;  outside

 

TILSON v ALSTOM TRANSPORT (2010)

Agency contract - attempt to imply contract of employment with client failed

'Control', whilst it may help to decide whether a contract is one of employment, does not of itself prove that there is a contract.

 

Wright v R&C Commissioners (2009) SC

employment status -  employed

'control' (labourers)

full report not yet located

Sherburn Aero v HMRC (2009) SC

employment status - not employed

The meaning of 'control' (flight instructors)

 

M KOVATS v (1) TFO MANAGEMENT LLP (2) THE FAMILY GROUP OF COMPANIES (2009) EAT

Unfair dismissal -not an employee

Considers the circumstances in which a partner in an LLP might be an employee of the LLP

 

Premier Groundworks Ltd v Jozsa 2009 EAT

Working Time regs - not a worker

Substitution - fettered / unfettered

 

Littlewood (JL Windows) v HMRC 2009 SpC

Employment status - not employed

MoO & control (window fitters)

 

HMRC v Larkstar 2008 ChD

IR35;  case originally heard by General Commissioners - remitted on 'case stated' appeal to fresh Commissioners for re-hearing

 

IR35 appeals are probably best brought before Special Commissioners!

CASTLE CONSTRUCTION (CHESTERFIELD) LTD v REVENUE & CUSTOMS COMMISSIONERS (2008) SpC

Employment status (PAYE);  Self-employed

Bricklayers;  MoO;  multiple engagers, little control, BIBOYA, intention, industry practice

 

Redrow Homes v Buckborough 2008 EAT

Employment status (working time);  Employed

Sham substitution provisions

 

Dragonfly v HMRC 2008 ChD

IR35;  inside
Appeal decision

See also comment here

Alternative Book Co v R&C 2008 SpC

IR35; inside

Substitution - a tie breaker, or a factor amongst others?

 

St Ives Plymouth Ltd v D Hagerty 2008 EAT

Employment;  umbrella employment contract found to exist

MOO and casual workers

 

Datagate v HMRC 2007 SC

IR35;  outside

Dragonfly v HMRC 2007 SC

IR35;  inside
Appeal pending

Upheld on appeal

First Word v HMRC 2007 SC

IR35;  outside

MKM v HMRC 2007 SC

IR35;  inside

James v Greenwich 2008 CA

Employment; not employed

Agency worker failed to secure employment rights against client

Netherlane v York 2005 SC

IR35;  inside

Who is the client?
Oral evidence from individual and client generally expected

 

Future On-line v HMIT 2004 ChD

IR35;  inside

 

 

Usetech v HMIT 2004 ChD

IR35;  inside

 

 

Ansell v HMIT 2004 SC

IR35;  outside

 

 

Tilbury v HMIT 2003 SC

IR35

Witness summons should be issued to client even if commercially prejudicial to ongoing relations

 

Synaptek v HMIT 2003 ChD

IR35;  inside

 

 

Synaptek v HMIT 2003 ChD

IR35

preliminary issues

 

Lime IT v CIR 2002 SC

IR35;  outside

 

 

FS Consulting v HMIT 2002 SC

IR35;  inside

 

 

R v IRC (PCG) CA 2001

IR35

 

 

R v IRC (PCG) QBD

IR35

 

 

Montgomery v Underwood 2001 CA

Employment;  not employed

Importance of MOO and control

 

Battersby v Campbell 2001 SC

IR35;  inside