s660 and the settlements legislation (UK)
Sharing ownership of a
family company, and using dividends as a means of spreading the withdrawn
profits remains a legitimate way of easing the total family tax bill –
but as time passes the Revenue are seeking to make doing this more and more of
a minefield.
Unless proper care is taken,
individuals who have a company in which others also hold shares and from which
those others receive dividends could (quite unnecessarily) find themselves
having to pay income tax themselves (and at their own highest rates) on those
dividends which have been received by others.
The basis principle is that
you cannot be taxed on income which is not your income, unless some statutory
provision so provides.
However, s660A & s660B
ICTA create such provisions, and can make a person liable for income tax on the
income of someone else; these rules and their impact also depend on the
relationship with Recipient, and the sections will apply as follows:
Income arising under a settlement during the life of
the settlor is treated and taxed as the income of the settlor if
any of the following apply:
Recipient:
Settlor’s unmarried minor child:
…if it
is paid to or for the benefit of (or otherwise treated by tax law as if it were
so paid) such child
Recipient:
Settlor’s spouse:
…unless it arises from an outright gift, unless (a) the gift does not carry the right to the whole of that income, or (b) the property given is wholly or substantially a right to income; or
…unless
the income consists of (a) annual payments made by an individual for
bona fide commercial reasons in connection with his trade, profession or
vocation, (b) certain charitable payments, or (c) benefit under approved
pension scheme.
Any
other Recipient:
…unless
it arises from property in which neither Settlor nor settlor’s spouse
retains an interest; or
…unless
the income consists of (a) annual payments made by an individual for
bona fide commercial reasons in connection with his trade, profession or
vocation, (b) certain charitable payments, or (c) benefit under approved
pension scheme.
Terms and expressions in bold have special or defined
meanings, or have been the subject of interpretation in case law.
Note that the above is paraphrased for ease of
getting a basic understanding; to understand the detail, there is no
substitute for looking at (and taking the trouble to understand!) the sections
themselves.
Bottom line: if you are primarily responsible
for making the money, and someone else gets some of the income by way of
dividends, then you are potentially at risk.
Husband and wife can still use shared ownership of a
family company to reduce their tax bills – they just have to be a little
more careful about the way in which they do so!. The Revenue’s current
attitude means that it has now become crucially important for the realities of
what generally happens (genuine joint control, joint effort, and equal
ownership) to be properly reflected in the underlying structure – and to
ensure that is done properly, most will now need to take proper advice from a
professional who has some understanding of the legislation and the case law.
If there is a legitimate way of avoiding income
being caught by these sections, then proper structuring of the commercial
venture generating the income is crucial.
In most situations, we can offer advice on the
likely impact of s660A and (where practicable and legitimate to do so) on steps
to secure the position.
To proceed
·
·
we will need you to complete and return our questionnaire;
·
·
we will then consider your responses,
·
·
we will schedule a discussion with you, and
·
·
after the discussion we will summarise our advice in writing.
Maybe,
but for the present, the law remains as declared by the House of Lords in the
Arctic case
If you're another lawyer or an accountant reading these pages, I'd be happy to discuss any points arising with you - particularly if you'd like to debate any points where you disagree with my views - mail me!
This page was last updated on 27th June 2011.
No liability is accepted for any inaccuracy in the information in these pages - see full disclaimer
© Egos Consultancy Ltd - ecl@egos.co.uk 2007-2011 - All rights reserved - see full copyright details
The information on these pages is provided free and for information only, and is provided 'as is'. Whilst believed to be correct, it is in no way comprehensive. It is provided for your interest only and is not intended to be relied on as formal legal advice. The posting of information on these pages is not intended to create a lawyer-client relationship, and you should not act or rely on this information without seeking professional advice. No liability is accepted therefore for any errors, or for any losses that may be incurred if it is relied on.
You may read these pages on-line, and
download them to read later, for your own personal use.
This copyright notice must appear on every page that you print from here.
You must not redistribute these pages or any part of them in any form or medium
without first obtaining my consent.
You are welcome to set up links to this website from others.